Fear of progression, depression, and sleep difficulties in people experiencing endometriosis-pain: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Endometriosis is a chronic condition generally characterised by severe pain. Recent findings demonstrate disproportionately elevated rates of insomnia and fatigue among people with endometriosis, particularly among those with associated pain. Yet there is little understanding of the psychological factors that might contribute to these sleep and fatigue related difficulties. We investigated whether fear of progression and depression interacted with pain to influence fatigue and insomnia among people with endometriosis-related pain. METHODS: A total of 206 individuals with endometriosis were included in this cross-sectional, online survey in January 2022. Participants provided relevant demographics and endometriosis characteristics. The BPI-SF, FoP-Q-SF, DASS-21, CFS and ISI were used to assess pain intensity, fear of progression, depression, fatigue, and insomnia symptoms, respectively. Associations between key variables were assessed with correlations. A path analysis determined whether the relationships between pain and fatigue, and pain and insomnia, depended on levels of fear of progression and depression. RESULTS: Controlling for age, fear of progression was uniquely associated with worse fatigue (ß = 0.348, p < .001) and insomnia (ß = 0.389, p < .001), and moderated the relationship between pain and fatigue (ß = 0.155, p = .009). Specifically, with increasing pain severity, the effects of fear of progression on fatigue were exacerbated. Depression was uniquely associated with fatigue (ß = 0.360, p < .001), but did not elicit any moderation effects. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the role of fear of progression and depression in endometriosis-related fatigue and insomnia, paving the way for future interventions targeting these constructs to be tested.

The 'revolving door' of mental illness: A meta-analysis and systematic review of current versus lifetime rates of psychological disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Therapists have long observed a phenomenon referred to as the 'revolving door' of mental health services, in which individuals often develop, seek treatment for, and recover from multiple mental illnesses across their life. However, this has not been systematically examined. If this phenomenon is widespread, one would expect that the number of lifetime disorders would exceed that of current disorders. The aim of this meta-analysis was to test this hypothesis. METHODS: A search was conducted of the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science. In total, 38 studies were included in the current review; 27 of these contained sufficient quantitative data to be included in the meta-analysis, addressing the primary research aim. The remaining 11 studies were included in the systematic review only. RESULTS: Meta-analyses of the 27 studies indicated that the average number of lifetime disorders was 1.84 times that of current disorders. Previous treatment significantly moderated this relationship, while the clinical nature of the sample did not. Examination of the remaining studies revealed common temporal sequences, indicating disorders which typically develop first or consequently to other disorders. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for the revolving door of mental illness, suggesting a need for transdiagnostic treatments and broader conceptualisation of relapse prevention.

The bodily threat monitoring scale: Development and preliminary validation in adult and childhood cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: Bodily threat monitoring is a core clinical feature of Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and is targeted in psycho-oncology treatments, yet no comprehensive self-report measure exists. The aim of this study was the theory-informed development and initial validation of the Bodily Threat Monitoring Scale (BTMS). METHODS: Adult survivors of breast and gynaecological cancers (Study 1: N = 306, age = 37-81 years) and childhood cancer survivors (Study 2: N = 126, age = 10-25 years) completed the BTMS, designed to assess how individuals monitor for and interpret uncertain symptoms as indicating that something is wrong with their body. Participants completed measures to assess construct and criterion validity of the BTMS, and childhood cancer survivors (Study 2) completed the BTMS again 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The 19-item BTMS demonstrated excellent internal consistency across adult and childhood cancer samples (α = 0.90-0.96). Factor analyses indicated two subscales capturing 1. Monitoring of bodily sensations and 2. Threatening interpretations of bodily sensations. Two-week stability estimates were acceptable. For construct validity, the BTMS correlated with body vigilance and anxiety sensitivity. The BTMS also demonstrated criterion validity, yielding significant associations with FCR, intolerance of uncertainty, help-seeking behaviours, and quality of life. The BTMS was associated with FCR while controlling for body vigilance and anxiety sensitivity, indicating a unique contribution of this theory-informed measure. CONCLUSIONS: The BTMS shows evidence of sound psychometric properties and could be used to elucidate the role of bodily threat monitoring in the maintenance and management of FCR.

A mixed-methods review and meta-synthesis of fears of recurrence and progression in people with mental health conditions.

A fear that one's physical illness will recur or worsen has received substantial research attention over the past decade, most notably as fear of cancer recurrence. Indeed, such fear is known to be associated with poorer quality of life, adjustment, and psychopathology. However, fear of a recurrence or progression (FORP) of mental health conditions has received comparatively little study. The present review aimed to, 1) systematically review quantitative research on FORP in mental health regarding its association with age, gender, quality of life, mental health outcomes, and health behaviours, and 2) meta-synthesize qualitative research related to FORP to construct a transdiagnostic model. A qualitative meta-synthesis of 19 studies identified four subthemes underlying FORP (fear of symptoms, loss of progress, fear of death, and traumatic experiences). The three themes related to FORP were: inability to trust oneself, hypervigilance, and a low-risk low-reward lifestyle which was comprised of three subthemes (limiting relationships, limiting life goals, and fear of changing treatment). A quantitative systematic review of 15 studies found that FORP was strongly associated with worse quality of life, and greater depression, anxiety, psychotic symptoms, and medication adherence, but was not associated with age or gender. Hence, FORP can be understood transdiagnostically, and is generally associated with poorer mental health outcomes but may also predict adaptive health behaviours, such as appropriate medication adherence.

Fear of progression, imagery, interpretation bias, and their relationship with endometriosis pain.

ABSTRACT: Endometriosis is a chronic gynaecological condition, of which pain is both the most common and most debilitating symptom. As with other forms of pain, there is increasing recognition of the role of psychological processes in bridging the gap between pain and pain impact, and yet these processes are not well understood in endometriosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the relevance of fear of progression, imagery, and interpretation bias in endometriosis, and their contribution to pain interference. A total of 221 participants (mean age = 38 years, SD = 7.8) with endometriosis were recruited from Endometriosis Australia. This cross-sectional study included relevant demographics and endometriosis characteristics; questionnaires to measure fear of progression, imagery, interpretation bias, and pain; and the word association task to measure interpretation bias. Participants reported high scores on the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (M = 38/60), higher than that has been found in cancer. Controlling for age and pain intensity, we found that imagery, interpretation bias, and their interaction were associated with increased fear of progression and that fear of progression was associated with greater pain-related interference. In exploratory analysis, we also found that the frequency and distress of endometriosis-related intrusive imagery were associated with greater fear of progression and pain interference, after controlling for age and pain intensity. These findings provide the first support of the importance of fear of progression in people with endometriosis and suggest possible pathways for causal investigation.

Is attentional bias variability causally implicated in emotional vulnerability? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present review was to determine whether attentional bias variability (ABV) is causally implicated in emotional vulnerability. We consider evidence examining whether ABV precedes and predicts later psychopathology, and whether modifying ABV leads to changes in psychological symptoms following an intervention. METHODS: A systematic literature search located 15 studies that met the inclusion criteria (3 longitudinal, 12 intervention). Eligible intervention studies were also meta-analysed. RESULTS: Preliminary evidence suggests that ABV predicts later post-traumatic stress symptomatology in interaction with number of traumatic events. The few interventions designed to reduce ABV suggest promise for improving PTSD symptoms. However, these interventions did not consistently change ABV, and where it was tested, change in ABV did not correspond to change in symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: There is emerging evidence that ABV could represent a vulnerability factor for psychological symptoms, particularly for those exposed to trauma. This may indicate attentional control difficulties, although this remains to be tested. Conclusions regarding the causal status of ABV will depend on future high-quality randomised controlled trials.

Does interpretation bias moderate the relationship between pain and fear of cancer recurrence?

OBJECTIVE: The Cancer Threat Interpretation model proposes that clinically significant fear of cancer recurrence/progression (FCR/P) can occur when people misinterpret ambiguous physical symptoms as a sign of recurrence. The aim of this research is to test whether interpretation biases moderate the relationship between pain and FCR/P in women with breast cancer, as predicted. METHOD: One hundred forty-seven women with breast cancer completed questionnaire measures of demographic and medical information, FCR/P, interpretation bias, and symptom burden, as well as other known predictors of FCR/P. RESULTS: Women with clinically significant levels of FCR/P were more likely to interpret ambiguous words as health-related and experienced more pain than women with levels of FCR/P in the nonclinical range. FCR was associated with both pain (r = .40, p < .001) and interpretation bias (r = .45, p < .001). Interpretation bias and pain (r = .31, p < .001) were also associated with each other. Moderation analyses confirmed that interpretation bias moderated the relationship between pain and FCR (F(1, 143) = 5.76; p = .01). However, this was not the case with FOP (F(1, 143) = .21; p = .65). CONCLUSION: We found that women with breast cancer with clinically significant FCR/P interpreted ambiguous words as health-related more often and experienced more pain than those with nonclinical FCR/P. Moreover, we found that among those with higher levels of pain, FCR was also higher only among those with higher levels of interpretation bias, as the threat interpretation model predicts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Attentional bias variability and its association with psychological and health symptoms: A meta-analysis.

The present meta-analysis sought to assess the association between an emerging neurocognitive marker of psychopathology in attentional bias variability (ABV) and key psychological and health outcomes. A comprehensive literature review yielded 53 studies in 43 manuscripts (N = 5428). Overall, clinical and sub-clinical samples exhibited greater ABV than control samples (g = 0.462). Trauma samples showed significantly greater ABV than control samples (g = 0.782, medium-large effect), whereas social anxiety samples did not (g = 0.147). Similarly, ABV was associated with degree of trauma symptoms (r = 0.21 - 0.25). ABV was associated with some symptoms of depression and anxiety, although these were small and inconsistent. These findings suggest a specific relationship between ABV and post-traumatic stress symptoms, with evidence equivocal for other psychological difficulties (although also less research). Key recommendations for future research include investigating mechanisms underlying ABV and the importance of controlling for non-attentional processes, such as reaction time variability, to ensure the validity of ABV measures.

Are fear of cancer recurrence and fear of progression equivalent constructs?

BACKGROUND: The predominant definition of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) conflates FCR with fear of progression (FOP). However, this assumption has never been tested. Importantly, if FCR and FOP are distinct and have different predictors, existing interventions for FCR may not be equally effective for survivors who fear progression rather than recurrence of their disease. The present study aimed to determine whether FCR and FOP are empirically equivalent; and whether they are predicted by the same theoretically derived variables. METHODS: Three hundred and eleven adults with a history of breast or ovarian cancer were analysed (n = 209, 67% in remission). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the items of the FCR Inventory severity subscale and short-form FOP Questionnaire together. Structural equation modelling was conducted to predict FCR and FOP and determine whether theoretical models accounted equally well for both constructs, and whether models were equally relevant to those with and without current disease. FINDINGS: The factor analysis demonstrated that the FCR Inventory severity subscale and the short-form FOP Questionnaire loaded onto distinct, but related, factors which represented FCR and FOP. Structural modelling indicated that risk perception and bodily threat monitoring were more strongly associated with FCR than FOP. However, both FCR and FOP were associated with metacognitions and intrusions. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest that whilst FCR and FOP are related with some overlapping predictors, they are not the same construct. Hence, it is necessary to ensure that in clinical practice and research these constructs are considered separately.